Why want Trump to risk a world war?

As Republican Americans, we are concerned that Trump wants to allow Putin to escalate tensions, potentially starting a world war. Putin's ideal scenario is for Trump to abandon NATO, which would enable him to pursue his long-desired world conflict.

Putin has several times indicated that an atomic bomb on London would be a perfect start. The crucial question is: why does Trump want to help him with that?

Does he hate the British people more than he loves Putin? NATO is the only reason Putin is not starting his world war, so why does Trump want to dismantle NATO? NATO is the most successful alliance ever in history, and Trump seems to have no understanding at all of its importance to the US.

If Trump genuinely desires a world war, why doesn't he openly communicate this to his voters? The backlash would be immediate, and his supporters would abandon the Republican Party in droves! Be honest with the voters, Trump!

 

One of the world's leading political experts supports many of Trump's views regarding Greenland

Anders Fogh Rasmussen is the founder and chairman of Rasmussen Global, an international political consultancy located in Brussels. The firm was established in 2014 after his tenure as NATO Secretary General and as Prime Minister of Denmark from the right-wing party.

Rasmussen Global advises both government and business clients worldwide, including the governments of Japan, Taiwan, Armenia, and Albania, as well as multinational corporations in the energy, finance, and technology sectors.

In 2025, the firm was designated as an undesirable organization in Russia, highlighting its active involvement in international geopolitical affairs.

Rasmussen outlines three key recommendations:

1. Denmark should establish a new defense and security agreement with the United States, as the current agreement is 75 years old and in need of an update.

2. Denmark should initiate an investment agreement aimed at attracting more private investment in critical sectors in Greenland.

3. Finally, there should be an agreement on stability and sustainability in investments to mitigate the influence of Russian and Chinese investments in Greenland.